Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:06
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What was the worst decision you ever did?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
The Unlikely Group Getting Rich Off Dave’s Hot Chicken’s $1 Billion Deal - Forbes
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Patriots QB Drake Maye Discusses Offense's Progress After Day One of Minicamp - New England Patriots
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warn - Politico
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
What nonsense did you hear today in India that made you laugh?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Can Taking Vitamins Fight Infection? Scientists Explain - SciTechDaily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Campbell’s Snack Business Struggles as Consumers Get Pickier About Food Spending - WSJ
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.